# Cline Pricing (2026): Free Extension and Token Costs

By Desmond Achebe · 2026-11-02 · Source: https://www.activepieces.com/blog/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-costs

---
<aside class="tldr"><p class="tldr-label">Summary</p><p>Cline costs nothing to install but bills entirely through your model provider's per-token rates, ranging from $150 monthly for light use to $2,000 for heavy use.</p><ul><li>Monthly costs range from $150 for light use to $2,000 for heavy use.</li><li>94.2% of input tokens from 13.5 million sessions were re-sent context from retries.</li><li>By November 2025, Cline reached 3.8 million installs, up from 1 million March.</li></ul></aside>

## Cline pricing today and the short answer

### Is Cline free? The direct pricing answer

**You pay $0 for the software**, which means costs are entirely operational. [Cline](https://cline.bot/blog/5m-installs-1m-open-source-grant-program) is an open-source AI coding agent that runs in an editor or terminal, much as [Activepieces](https://www.activepieces.com) is open source for automation.

![Laptop with editor and terminal beside a free software box](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/eec9d6ac-c6e9-46b3-adc3-e27475968022/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-cost-ede457be.webp)

Your monthly bill's whatever your model provider charges for the tokens you use.

Cline pricing is the cost of running Cline, which is free software, and it works out to the per-token fees your chosen model provider charges for the AI usage your coding work generates each month.

Budget against the tall block, because the thin one won't move.

That's also why the install count matters less than your own habits. [Sacra](https://sacra.com/c/cline/) put Cline at 1 million installs in March 2025, which made it a niche tool.

![Cline installations across 2026](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/c80e8625-70fe-4d20-b6c9-15613e201fc4/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-cost-32be56a0.svg "Source: Sacra")

It reported 2.7 million by July 2025, so the base nearly tripled in four months. By November 2025 the figure was 3.8 million, and every one of those installs can produce a very different invoice.

Anyone who connects an agent to wider automation, through something like [Activepieces](https://www.activepieces.com), should expect the same pattern: the tool's cheap and the usage is what costs money.

### How Cline pricing was verified and when

I verified the plans and terms on cline.bot's pricing page and its documentation on 2 November 2026. Treat anything here as a snapshot, because providers revise token rates and Cline revises its plans, and either change moves your total.

I haven't seen a later count I can cite, so the trend stops at November 2025. Those install figures are from [Sacra](https://sacra.com/c/cline/).

## Cline plans, prices and usage limits

If you want the firm numbers, the extension costs nothing and ClinePass is $9.99 a month, but the other tiers carry no price I can confirm, so your own token habits settle the real bill.

![Printed price table with some rows filled and others blank](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/6a520b5c-a03c-4f0f-9a4f-962ee475d16b/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-cost-84f16610.webp)

Read the "not published" cells as gaps to close before you budget, not as zeros.

| Plan | Price per month | Included | Usage limits | Who it is for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free open-source extension | $0 | The Cline extension itself | None from Cline; your model provider's rates apply | Solo developers who already hold a provider key |
| ClinePass | $9.99 | A flat monthly Cline subscription | Not published | Individuals who want a predictable fixed fee |
| Provider credits | Varies with usage | Prepaid balance spent on model calls | Whatever balance you load | Anyone who prefers one invoice over separate provider accounts |
| Team | Not published | Not published | Not published | Small groups sharing a setup |
| Enterprise | Not published | Not published | Not published | Larger organizations with procurement requirements |

### What the Cline pricing table leaves out

Multiply by twelve and only one row survives, because **only that row holds a firm monthly price**. The free tier's cheap to install, but it moves the entire cost to your provider, and heavy agentic sessions can make that the largest line on your statement.

You get one flat number in ClinePass, yet its usage ceiling is unpublished. A fixed fee means little until you know where throttling or overage begins, so ask before assuming it caps your spend.

Try to price team or enterprise and you hit blanks for price, inclusions and limits.

I distrust any tier I can't cost without a sales call, because that gap hides the very figure you need. Treat those two rows as a request for a quote, and carry your weekly token estimate into that conversation.

## Realistic Cline costs per month

Because Cline itself costs $0, your bill's the token line.

It runs about $150 a month at moderate-heavy use, **$800 for an effective engineer**, and $2,000 for a power user, per [smcleod.net](https://smcleod.net/2025/04/the-cost-of-agentic-coding/), so monthly spend depends directly on usage intensity.

The table below puts those three figures next to the subscription line, and the gap between the two columns is the point.

| Use | Monthly API bill | Cline subscription line |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate-heavy | about $150 | $0 |
| Daily | about $800 | $0 |
| Heavy | about $2,000 | $0 |

![Three invoice stacks of increasing height](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/8e7d6ffa-b33f-425a-8ddd-a8378628dc1e/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-cost-02abcdd7.webp)

More than 13x separates the first row from the last, and the software fee is zero in every row, so your bill depends entirely on usage, with no fees or minimum. **Your habits set the total**, not the plan you pick.

According to [Anthropic's price page](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/models/overview), Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. That's the cheap end, so a moderate-heavy user at about $150 a month is mostly paying for volume, not for an expensive model.

<blockquote class="pull"><p>Your habits set the total, not the plan you pick.</p></blockquote>

### Cline token costs for daily developers

At about $800 a month, the effective engineer is spending roughly what a decent laptop costs, every month, so the annual per-person AI cost exceeds what most teams budget for hardware.

If you default to Opus 5.5 for every task, expect the daily bill to land well above the cheap-model version of the same workload.

![What popular Cline models charge per million tokens](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/888c61ec-7877-44ff-8e65-af558de291e5/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-cost-3815bb27.svg "Source: Anthropic and OpenAI price pages")

It prices at $4 and $20 per million tokens, double Sonnet 5.5 on both sides, which means the price premium stays constant whether you're buying input or output tokens.

### Cline token costs for heavy agentic use

At $2,000 a month, the power user is where the math breaks, because at that scale the cost-benefit analysis can no longer balance.

![Monthly API bills by type of coding agent user](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/71a9a588-438f-4436-b87f-48ccd1b62893/cline-pricing-2026-free-extension-and-token-cost-8e886eba.svg "Source: smcleod.net (2025)")

Five times Sonnet 5.5: that is GPT-6 Astra at $10 input and $50 output per million tokens, and agentic loops that re-read files and retry multiply tokens on top of that, which means every agentic attempt costs substantially more than the published per-token rate.

## Hidden Cline costs and limits

Since the sticker price is the smallest part of the bill, a spending cap helps. Most of the overrun comes from context you pay for repeatedly, from loops that burn tokens without progress, and from provider rules you never read.

### Cline context growth and repeated token reads

When a session runs long, every request re-sends the conversation so far, so a long task costs far more than the sum of its steps.

Across 13.5 million GitHub Copilot agentic sessions, a coding assistant comparable to Cline, 197.1 billion of 209.2 billion **input tokens (94.2%) were re-sent context**, so most of the input token cost is from context that gets sent multiple times across retries.

![Activepieces MCP Server setup page with client configuration instructions and code example.](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/8affcbbd-a52f-4275-ac83-32c629beafe3/suno-mcp-how-to-connect-it-to-ai-tools-2026-guid-4dc1cc00.webp)

Because nearly everything you pay for is something the model has already seen, the fixes target history:

- Start a new task instead of extending a long one.
- Avoid having the agent read large files whole when a targeted excerpt will do.
- Interrupt retry loops early, because each failed attempt adds its output to the history of every later call.
- Watch extended-thinking settings, since reasoning tokens bill as output, usually the pricier side.

### Cline rate limits and prepaid credit rules

Once a session is throttled, it stalls, and people respond by switching to a pricier model or running parallel tasks, which multiplies spend. That is how rate limits cost money indirectly.

Before you load prepaid credits, read the provider's rules on expiry, minimum top-ups, and refunds, because unused balance that lapses is money you paid for nothing.

For a team, every habit above is multiplied by headcount, even though Cline itself is free.

Per-seat fees on provider or management plans stack on top of token usage, and anything that requires a sales call to price deserves a written quote before you commit.

## Cline versus Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

Capping each developer matters most with Cline. Of the four tools here it's the one whose extension has no subscription of its own, so every token lands on the provider's invoice unless you opt into ClinePass.

The table below shows how the four differ in billing shape, and the column to watch is the last one, since that's where a quiet month turns into a loud one.

| | Monthly price | Flat or metered | Bring your own key | Included model usage | Costs more at heavy use when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cline | Free software (Nov 2026) | Metered by provider | Yes, core design | None | Long agent loops and large contexts run up token charges |
| Cursor | Tiered subscription (Nov 2026) | Flat base, metered beyond allowance | Partial | Plan allowance | Heavy use exhausts the allowance and overage begins |
| GitHub Copilot | Tiered subscription (Nov 2026) | Flat base, limits on premium requests | Limited | Plan allowance | Premium models drain the request allowance faster |
| Claude Code | Subscription or API billing (Nov 2026) | Either, by how you sign in | Via API key | Subscription allowance | API billing scales with every session |

Read it as a map of who carries the risk: the three flat-leaning tools absorb some of your variance, while **Cline hands all of it back to you**.

For developers who use the assistant hard and steadily, flat-rate wins, because the subscription turns an unpredictable bill into a fixed line.

### When Cline is cheaper

If you're a light or bursty user, Cline's cheaper, because a subscription would charge you for allowance you never touch. It also suits teams that want to pick the cheapest adequate model per task instead of paying for a bundle.

The verdict: steady heavy users save with a flat plan, occasional users save with Cline, and anyone running long agent loops should keep the caps from the previous section regardless.

## How to keep Cline spend predictable

Keep spend predictable by setting a hard ceiling at the provider, matching the model to the task, and reviewing real usage on a schedule. The caps from the previous section only work if the rest of this routine backs them up.

### Budgets and caps

**Set the limit on the provider's side, not in your head.** Cline can show you what a task has cost, but the provider's console is the only place that can refuse the next request.

A monthly budget with an alert below it means a runaway loop ends as an email, not as an invoice.

Use the expensive model only where it earns its cost, since price scales with the model. Claude Opus 5.5 suits long agentic coding.

Claude Haiku 5.5 or a Flash-class model handles renames, boilerplate and quick questions. Defaulting to the top model for everything means paying flagship rates for work a cheaper model finishes just as well.

### Tracking Cline spend across a team

Once more than one person's spending, the per-task cost display stops being enough, because nobody sees the total. Give each developer their own provider key so the console breaks usage down by person.

Then hold one weekly review: compare the console against the task history in Cline, and find the tasks that cost far more than they should have.

If you want that weekly report or threshold alert sent to Slack or a sheet, you can build it in [Activepieces](https://www.activepieces.com), which has 746 integrations counted from its open source monorepo and unlimited flows on every plan, including free.

On the Plus plan and up it runs on your own AI keys, so every AI step costs 1 credit and the model cost goes to your own provider bill.

Reselling you a model settles your AI choice and its price before you've opened the product, and you can reach Activepieces from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any MCP client.

The flow builder below shows a trigger feeding a code step, with a variables panel holding a stored value the step can read, which is enough to compare spend against a threshold and notify someone.

![Inserting a variable from the Data Selector](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/9ea49ac8-82f0-4f0c-b799-21dbbae83a99/what-actually-transfers-when-you-migrate-off-aut-9a6cc803.webp)

That automation only reports. The cap at the provider is still what stops the spending.

## Before choosing your Cline plan

Spend a week measuring your own usage, because the cap limits the damage but only your own tasks tell you what the bill will be. The six steps below turn the pricing page into a number you can defend:

1. Open cline.bot's pricing page and write down the date. Plans change, and a dated note tells you later whether a surprise came from your habits or from a revision.
2. Run Cline free for a week on a real task, using your own provider key. Billing then lands on your provider account, where the cap you set protects you, and a real task shows your real token appetite instead of a demo's.
3. Read the cost per task from the provider's usage dashboard. Count tasks rather than days. A day with one sprawling refactor and a day with ten small fixes can cost the same, and only the per-task figure carries over to other weeks.
4. Multiply that cost by the number of tasks you expect in a month. Do it twice, once for a typical week and once for your worst. The gap between the two is your budgeting risk, and the worst-week figure is what the cap should be set against.
5. Price a flat-rate coding tool for the same workload. If your metered total sits well above the flat fee, you're paying for flexibility you may not use. If it sits well below, the flat fee is paying for headroom you never touch.
6. Pick the tier or the seat count last. Choose it from the multiplied figure, not from the feature list, so you can say what the tool costs per task before anyone on a sales call suggests a number.

## What Activepieces does about this

Activepieces doesn't lower the provider's token bill, and I'd distrust any tool that claimed to. What it does is make the weekly review from the previous section something that runs without you.

You build a flow that pulls usage from your provider, compares it with the threshold you set, and posts to Slack or a sheet when a week runs hot. The cap at the provider still decides what gets refused.

The flow just tells you early enough to act.

The pricing shape matches the argument of this article. Every plan, free included, has unlimited flows, so a spend watcher costs nothing to leave running. On the Plus plan and up, Activepieces runs on your own AI keys, and each AI step costs 1 credit.

![Activepieces pricing page showing four plan tiers with prices ranging from free to enterprise](https://ap-marketing-media.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/9f8c4550-3a1d-4bde-a021-c968c6cb2e28/activepieces-rbac-pricing-plans-and-roles-2026-s-ff91a93e.webp)

The model cost lands on your own provider invoice, where your cap and per-person keys already apply. That keeps the metering in one place and avoids a second token bill hidden inside the automation tool.

The codebase is open source under the MIT licence for the community edition, and the integration count of 746 comes from counting the monorepo directly. For a team that already chose Cline to avoid lock-in, that's the relevant check.

You can read what the flow does and host it yourself. If you'd rather drive it from your editor, Activepieces is reachable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any MCP client.

I have no named customer to point to for this specific use, so treat it as a build you can test in a week, not a proven recipe.

## Frequently asked questions

### The software price

Is Cline really free?

Yes, the Cline software itself costs nothing to install and run. The bill comes from whichever model provider you connect, so a free tool still produces a monthly invoice, sized by how many tokens your habits burn.

### API keys

Do I need my own API key to use Cline?

No, not in every setup, but bringing your own key is the most direct arrangement. You create an account with a provider, paste the key in, and your usage is billed there.

If you choose a hosted option instead, read the pricing page first, because a bundled plan only helps if your usage actually fits it.

### Markup on model usage

Does Cline charge a markup on model usage?

With your own provider key, the charge you see is the provider's rate, since Cline isn't in the billing path.

Other routes can differ, so compare the per-token price on the pricing page against the provider's own list before you commit. If a price can't be read without a sales call, treat that as a cost in itself.

### Team invoicing

Can a team get one invoice for Cline usage?

By pointing every member at a single provider account or organization, a team gets one invoice, and the provider bills one party for all of it.

The catch is attribution: one invoice tells you the total, not who spent it. Separate keys per person or per project give you the breakdown that a lump sum hides.

### Seeing task cost

How do I see what a Cline task cost?

While a task runs, Cline displays token counts and running cost in the interface, so you can check it then instead of after the invoice arrives.

Cross-check those figures against the provider's usage dashboard, which is the number you'll actually be charged. A few tasks logged this way will show you your real per-task average faster than any estimate.

## Related reading

- [Kimi K3.1 Pro API Pricing: Token Costs in 2026](https://www.activepieces.com/blog/kimi-k31-pro-api-pricing-token-costs-in-2026)
- [Baseten Pricing 2026: Costs, GPUs and Token Rates](https://www.activepieces.com/blog/baseten-pricing-2026-costs-gpus-and-token-rates)
- [SiliconFlow Pricing: Model Costs Per Token (2026)](https://www.activepieces.com/blog/siliconflow-pricing-model-costs-per-token-2026)

## References

- [smcleod.net](https://smcleod.net/2025/04/the-cost-of-agentic-coding/)
- [Anthropic and OpenAI price pages](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/models/overview)
- [Sacra](https://sacra.com/c/cline/)
